Anne Andersdatter Widing (-shortly before 13 December 1701)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Spouses and relationship events
Married:1Hans Giertsen (-after 1701), servant of bailie Mads Holm
Married:2Edvard Ludt (-)
Children
Children with Edvard Ludt:
Trinche Edvardsdatter Ludt (-before 29 July 1698)3
Anders Edvardsen Ludt (-shortly before 20 January 1730)4
Sille Edvardsdatter Ludt (-shortly before 20 May 1733)5
Wibeche Edvardsdatter Ludt (-shortly before 23 October 1696)6
Ide Edvardsdatter Ludt (-shortly before 20 January 1701)7
Marckie Edvardsdatter Ludt (-July 1671)
Attributes
Events
Probate:813 December 1701Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Died:9shortly before 13 December 1701
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 , , , p. 1014-15, Anne Andersdatter Widding, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
2 , , , p. 1867, Anne Andersdtr, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
3 , , , p. 1014-15, Anne Andersdatter Widding, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.