Marckie Evertsdatter (-)

Same as
Additional names
Marckien Effuerttzdatr1
Marckie Effuertsdat2
Parents
Father:3Efferdts Annickie (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:419 January 1669Anders Jacobsen Dishington (-January 1693)Nykirken [Unknown/Unspecified], Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Children
Children with Anders Jacobsen Dishington:
Jan Andersen Dishington (1671-)5
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1668-1820 (1308M8)", Database, Digitalarkivet (https://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet : ), hv00000000109487.
2 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1668-1820 (1308M8)", Database, Digitalarkivet (https://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001078707.
3 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1668-1820 (1308M8)", Database, Digitalarkivet (https://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001078675.
4 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1668-1820 (1308M8)", Database, Digitalarkivet (https://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet : ), hv00000000109487.
5 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1668-1820 (1308M8)", Database, Digitalarkivet (https://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001078675.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.