Sander Helt (-before 19 February 1702)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Spouses and relationship events
Married:1Effi Hiermundsdatter (-)
Children
Children with :
Jonas Helt (-before 27 March 1715)2
Zander Helt (-before 16 January 1743)3
Malene Helt (-before 18 December 1699)4
Attributes
Events
Born:5Montrose [city/town], Angus [county], Scotland [country], United Kingdom [country]
Burgess:622 January 1641Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Probate:719 February 1702 and 5 December 1703Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Died:8before 19 February 1702
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 , "Koppskatt 1683 for Bergen", Database, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet : ), ot00000000118177.
2 , , , p. 978, Zander Helt, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 , "Borgere i 1301 Bergen 1600-1751", Database, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet : ), oc00000000018112.
6 Ibid
7 , , , p. 978, Zander Helt, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
8 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.