James Dunbar of Conzie (-10 March 1553-54)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Mother:1Janet Sutherland (-1511 or 1512)
Father:2Alexander Dunbar of Conzie and Kilbuyack (-around 31 March 1493)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3Isabella Brodie (-)
Married:41508-09Ellen Innes of Auchintoul (-)
Children
Children with Isabella Brodie:
George Dunbar (-)5
Children with Ellen Innes of Auchintoul:
Alexander Dunbar of Conzie and Kilbuyack (-27 February 1578-79)6
Children with :
Marjory Dunbar (-)7
Attributes
Events
Died:810 March 1553-54
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VIII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1911), Sutherland, p. 330-32, VII John.
2 Ibid
3 Charles Mosley, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage, and Knightage, Clan Chiefs, Scottish Feudal Barons, Volume I: 107th Edition (: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, ), Dunbar of Mochrum, p. 1206-09.
4 Ibid
5 Rev. William Temple, The Thanage of Fermartyn: Including the District Commonly Called Formartine, its Proprietors, with Genealogical Deductions; its Parishes, Ministers, Churches, Churchyards, Antiquities, &c (Aberdeen: D. Wyllie & son, 1894), p. 165-67, Dunbars of Conzie.
6 Charles Mosley, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage, and Knightage, Clan Chiefs, Scottish Feudal Barons, Volume I: 107th Edition (: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, ), Dunbar of Mochrum, p. 341-43.
7 Peter Beauclerk Dewar, Burke's Landed Gentry of Great Britain - The Kingdom in Scotland 19th Edition Volume 1: Together with Members of the Titled and Non-titled Contemporary Establishment (Wilmington, Delaware, USA: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, 2001), Rose of Kilravock, p. 1177-79.
8 Charles Mosley, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage, and Knightage, Clan Chiefs, Scottish Feudal Barons, Volume I: 107th Edition (: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, ), Dunbar of Mochrum, p. 1206-09.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.