Isabel de Portugal (4 October 1503-1 May 1539)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Spouses and relationship events
Married:110 March 1526Karl V (24 February 1500-21 September 1558), EmperorSeville [municipality], Province of Seville [county], Andalusia [state], Spain [country]
Children
Children with Karl V:
Felipe II (21 May 1527-13 September 1598), King of Spain, Sicily and Sardinia2
MarĂ­a of Spain (21 June 1528-26 February 1603)3
Fernando of Spain (22 November 1529-13 July 1530)4
Juana of Spain (26 June 1535-7 September 1573)5
Juan of Spain (19 October 1537-20 March 1538)6
(Unnamed) (1539, probably 30 April-)7
Attributes
Events
Born:84 October 1503Lisbon [municipality], Lisbon District [district], Portugal [country]
Buried:91539Granada [municipality], Province of Granada [county], Andalusia [state], Spain [country]
Died:101 May 1539Toledo [municipality], Province of Toledo [county], Castile-La Mancha [state], Spain [country]
She died in childbirth.
Buried:111574El Escorial [municipality], Madrid [state], Spain [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Castile & Leon, Counts & Kings.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.