Elizabeth Forbes (-December 1570)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1John Forbes (-1547), 6. Lord Forbes
Mother:2Christian Lundin (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3before 1525Gilbert Keith of Troup (-December 1537)
Married:4before 1541Alexander Innes of that Ilk (1494-September 1553), 14. Laird of Innes
Married:51553-54Alexander Dunbar of Conzie and Kilbuyack (-27 February 1578-79)
Children
Children with Gilbert Keith of Troup:
George Keith (-)6
Elizabeth Keith (-)7
Margaret Keith (-)8
Children with Alexander Innes of that Ilk:
Margaret Innes (-)9
Margaret Innes (-)10
Children with Alexander Dunbar of Conzie and Kilbuyack:
Alexander Dunbar of Conzie and Mochrum (-1585), Laird of Mochrum11
David Dunbar of Kinstairie (-)12
Patrick Dunbar of Eastergrange (-)13
Gavin Dunbar (-), archdeacon of Moray14
William Dunbar of Hempriggs (-)15
Attributes
Events
Died:16December 1570
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume IV: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1907), Lord Forbes, p. 53-55, VI John Forbes.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume VI: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909), Marischal, p. 42-45, III William Keith.
4 Peter Beauclerk Dewar, Burke's Landed Gentry of Great Britain - The Kingdom in Scotland 19th Edition Volume 1: Together with Members of the Titled and Non-titled Contemporary Establishment (Wilmington, Delaware, USA: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, 2001), Innes-Ker, p. 767-72.
5 Ibid
6 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume VI: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909), Marischal, p. 42-45, III William Keith.
7 Ibid
8 , Illustrations of the Topography and Antiquities of the Shires of Aberdeen and Banff vol III: (Aberdeen: The Spalding Club, 1857), p. 286-88, ancestors of Menzies of Pitfoddels.
9 Peter Beauclerk Dewar, Burke's Landed Gentry of Great Britain - The Kingdom in Scotland 19th Edition Volume 1: Together with Members of the Titled and Non-titled Contemporary Establishment (Wilmington, Delaware, USA: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, 2001), Innes-Ker, p. 767-72.
10 Roland William Saint-Clair, The Saint-Clairs of the Isles: Being a History of the Sea-Kings of Orkney and their Scottish Successors of the Sirname of Sinclair (Auckland: H. Brett, General Printer and Publihsher, 1898), The Sinclairs of Stemster and Dunbeath, p. 220-22.
11 Charles Mosley, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage, and Knightage, Clan Chiefs, Scottish Feudal Barons, Volume I: 107th Edition (: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, ), Dunbar of Mochrum, p. 341-43.
12 Charles Mosley, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage, and Knightage, Clan Chiefs, Scottish Feudal Barons, Volume I: 107th Edition (: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, ), Dunbar of Mochrum, p. 1206-09.
13 Ibid
14 Ibid
15 Ibid
16 Charles Mosley, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage, and Knightage, Clan Chiefs, Scottish Feudal Barons, Volume I: 107th Edition (: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, ), Dunbar of Mochrum, p. 341-43.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.