Mette Nagel (1682-)

Same as
Additional names
Mætte Dommenicusdatter1
Parents
Father:2Dominicus Berentsen Nagell (around 1640-before 1707), merchant
Mother:3Mette Sørensdatter Døsen (-1692)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:4Axel Andersen (-)
Children
Children with Axel Andersen:
Søren (1710-after 1744)5
Maren Axelsdatter (1714-)6
Margrete Kristine Axelsdatter (1721-)7
Bernt Nagel (1727-), musketeer8
Attributes
Events
Born:91682Årdal kommune [municipality], Sogn og Fjordane [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Born:101687 or before
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 , "Indre Sogn sorenskriveri, skifteprotokoll nr. A 2, 1689-1695", database, Arkivverket, Digitalarkivet (http://digitalarkivet.no : ), fa00000000049586; .
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1700-1723 (1308M8)", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001055803.
5 Ibid
6 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1700-1723 (1308M8)", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001056350.
7 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1717-1764 (1308M8)", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001092457.
8 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1717-1764 (1308M8)", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001093445.
9 A. M. Wiesener, "Bergenske studier. Folk og forhold i 15- og 1600-tallet: ," Bergens historiske forening. Skrifter. 38 (1932): 305-65, p. 359-60, IV.5 Mette Dominicusdatter Nagel.
10 , "Indre Sogn sorenskriveri, skifteprotokoll nr. A 2, 1689-1695", database, Arkivverket, Digitalarkivet (http://digitalarkivet.no : ), fa00000000049586; .
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.