Sir William Seton of Seton (-before March 1409-10)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Mother:1Margaret de Seton (-), Lady of Seton
Father:2Alan de Wyntoun (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3Janet/Jonet Fleming (-)
Children
Children with Janet/Jonet Fleming:
Sir Alexander Seton (-between 31 August 1440 and 3 April 1441), Lord of Gordon4
Janet Seton (-)5
Children with :
Sir John Seton of that Ilk (-before 1434)6
Anna Seton (-)7
Attributes
Events
Died:8before March 1409-10
Personal Info
He is designed Lord of that Ilk and of Tranent in a charter whereby he granted the lands of Wester Fausyde to John de Fausyde, his esquire. He seems to have granted certain lands in Longniddrie to John Maitland and John de Paynston by charter confirmed by King Robert II 18 January 1380-81. He was a distinguished soldier, and like his father he took part in the holy war, it is said before 1383; he seems to have served with the Scottish force which raided the north of England in that year. He styled himself 'Baron, lord of Seton' in a petition to the Pope which was granted 27 October 1394, but is designed Knight in a charter of the lands of Borde granted by him in favour of Patrick Fleming, dated 14 May 1402. It would seem that he was taken prisoner by the English at the battle of Homildon Hill 14 September 1402, and he may perhaps have remained unransomed for some years, as one William Seton was in captivity in the Tower along with the King of Scotland's son in 1406. A charter of confirmation was granted at Perth, 27 March 1408, by Robert, Duke of Albany, Governor ol the Kingdom, ratifying the grant of an annualrent made by William de Seton, Knight, with consent of the Duke's beloved cousin, John de Seton, Knight, his son and heir, to Walter de Haliburton of Dirleton, in consideration of the transfer to the said William of the gift of the ward and marriage of Elizabeth de Gordon, daughter and heir of the deceased Adam Gordon, Knight. Sir William died before March 1409-10, and was buried in the Cordelere (Franciscan) freiris at Haddington, to which community he had made certain benefactions.9
There is some indication that Sir William was twice married; if so, the name of his first wife is unknown, but Jonet Fleming, elder daughter of Sir David Fleming of Biggar, was the mother of his second son.10
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VIII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1911), Winton, p. 570-71, Margaret de Seton.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume IV: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1907), Huntly, p. 518-21, Elizabeth Gordon.
4 Ibid
5 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VIII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1911), Winton, p. 571-73, William de Seton.
6 Ibid
7 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume IV: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1907), Hamilton, p. 342-44, David Fitz Walter.
8 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VIII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1911), Winton, p. 571-73, William de Seton.
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.