Andrew Hawick of Scatsta (around 1556-after 1627) |
| |||
| |||
| |||
| Father:1 | Vincencius Hawick of Scatstay (-before 16 July 1573) | ||
| Mother:2 | Margaret Strang (-after 16 July 1573) | ||
| |||||
| Married:3 | Elizabeth Mowat (-after 21 September 1614) | ||||
| ||
| Children with : | ||
| Bartholomew Hawick of Nischeam/Scatsta (-after 7 August 1630)4 | ||
| Daniel Hawick (-after 6 September 1628)5 | ||
| Andrew Hawick (-after 5 August 1631)6 | ||
| Arthur Hawick (-after 1627)7 | ||
| |||||
| ||||
| Born:8 | around 1556 | |||
| Died:9 | after 1627 | |||
| Died:10 | before 7 October 1634 | |||
| ||
| He was an adult in 1573.11 | ||
| Gilbert Goudie has the opinion that the later Andrew Hawick of Scatsta is too old to be identical to the eldest son of Vincencius. "On 15th February, 1575, Andrew Hawick of Scatsta, "of the age of xl zeires or thairby, unmareit, examint upon the poyntis contenit in the former bill, anent the invading of Arthur Sinclair of Ayth, be the laird of Cultmalindie and his complices," gave evidence before the Commission before mentioned of the attempt made by Laurence Bruce to murder Arthur Sinclair of Ayth, at Scalloway." He gives no reference for this citation. There is no such document in "Shetland Documents 1195-1579".12 | ||
| ||
| |||
| certainly | The information is supported by primary sources. |
| probably | The information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources. |
| possibly | It is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence. |
| likely | The information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence. |
| apparently | The information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct. |
| perhaps | The information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption. |
| disproved | The information is proven to be wrong. |