Philipp Wilhelm August von Pfalz-Neuburg (18 November 1668-10 April 1693)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Philipp Wilhelm (24 November 1615-2 September 1690), Elector Palatine
Mother:2Elisabeth Amalie Magdalena von Hessen-Darmstadt (20 March 1635-4 August 1709)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:329 October 1690Anna Maria Franziska von Sachsen-Lauenburg (13 June 1672-15 October 1741)Roudnice nad Labem [municipality], Ústí nad Labem Region [county], Czech Republic [country]
Children
Children with Anna Maria Franziska von Sachsen-Lauenburg:
Leopoldine Eleonore Elisabeth Auguste von Pfalz-Neuburg (22 October 1691-10 March 1692)4
Maria Anna Karoline Louise Franziska von Pfalz-Neuburg (30 January 1693-12 September 1751)5
Attributes
Events
Buried:6Zákupy [municipality], Česká Lípa District [district], Liberec Region [county], Czech Republic [country]
Born:718 November 1668Neuburg an der Donau [city/town], Neuburg-Schrobenhausen [county], Bavaria [state], Germany [country]
Died:810 April 1693Reichstädt [municipality], Greiz [county], Thuringia [state], Germany [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Palatinate.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.