Beate Sehested til Himmelmark og Kohøved (23 July 1535-8 January 1589)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Spouses and relationship events
Married:113 August 1553Povl Rantzau til Bothkamp, Lindved, Stendorf, Arlevad, Schaphus, Beyenfleth og Himmelmark (16 October 1527-22/24 March 1579)Itzehoe [city/town], Steinburg [county], Schleswig-Holstein [state], Germany [country]
Children
Children with Povl Rantzau til Bothkamp, Lindved, Stendorf, Arlevad, Schaphus, Beyenfleth og Himmelmark:
Mette Rantzau (-24 April 1579)2
Gert Rantzau til Bothkamp og Kohøved (20 July 1554-)3
Otto Rantzau til Bothkamp, Kohøved og Himmelmark (1555-1604)4
Margrethe Rantzau (1556-after 1624)5
Catharine Rantzau (1559-)6
Breide Rantzau til Bothkamp og Beyenfleth (1563-1639)7
Magdalene Rantzau (26 August 1564-)8
Melchior Rantzau til Arlevad (1565-after 1611)9
Cai Rantzau (1566-9 September 1580)10
Johannes Rantzau (1567-23 January 1587)11
Henrik Rantzau til Lindved og Beyenfleth (26 June 1568-1593)12
Daniel Rantzau (17 December 1569-24 November)13
Bertram Rantzau til Kohøved, Himmelmark og Bornstein (17 December 1569-1627)14
Ida Rantzau (1570-1 January 1638)15
Attributes
Events
Born:1623 July 1535
Died:178 January 1589Kiel [city/town], Schleswig-Holstein [state], Germany [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 J. V. Teisen and Louis Bobé, Danmarks Adels Aarbog 1930: (København: J. H. Schultz Forlagsboghandel A/S, 1930), Rantzau line VI, gen. 2, p. 40-41.
2 J. V. Teisen and Louis Bobé, Danmarks Adels Aarbog 1930: (København: J. H. Schultz Forlagsboghandel A/S, 1930), Rantzau line VI, gen. 3, p. 41-44.
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
13 Ibid
14 Ibid
15 Ibid
16 J. V. Teisen and Louis Bobé, Danmarks Adels Aarbog 1930: (København: J. H. Schultz Forlagsboghandel A/S, 1930), Rantzau line VI, gen. 2, p. 40-41.
17 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.