Magdalena Katharina von Zweibrücken (26 April 1607-10 January 1648)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Johann (26 March 1584-9 August 1635), Pfalzgraf von Zweibrücken
Mother:2Catherine de Rohan (20 June 1578-10 May 1607)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:314 November 1630Christian I (3 September 1598-6 September 1654), Pfalzgraf von Birkenfeld zu BischweilerZweibrücken [city/town], Rhineland-Palatinate [state], Germany [country]
Children
Children with Christian I:
(Unnamed) (13 September 1631-)4
Gustav Adolf von Pfalz-Birkenfeld-Bischweiler (2 July 1632-4 August 1632)5
Johann Christian von Pfalz-Birkenfeld-Bischweiler (16 June 1633-19 August 1633)6
Dorothea Katharina von Pfalz-Birkenfeld-Bischweiler (3/13 July 1634-7 December 1715)7
Louise Sophie von Pfalz-Birkenfeld-Bischweiler (16 August 1635-25 September 1691)8
Christian II (22 June 1637-26 April 1717), Pfalzgraf von Birkenfeld zu Birkenfeld9
Johann Karl (17 October 1638-21 February 1704), Pfalzgraf von Birkenfeld zu Gelnhausen10
Anna Magdalena zu Bischweiler (14 February 1640-12 December 1693)11
Klara Sibilla von Birkenfeld (20 February 1643-27 March 1644)12
Attributes
Events
Buried:13Bischwiller [municipality], Bas-Rhin [district], Alsace [county], France [country]
Born:1426 April 1607Zweibrücken [city/town], Rhineland-Palatinate [state], Germany [country]
Died:1510 January 1648Strasbourg [municipality], Bas-Rhin [district], Alsace [county], France [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Palatinate.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
13 Ibid
14 Ibid
15 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.