William de Lindsay (-)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Sir Walter de Lindsay (-)
William must have been either a son or a younger brother of Walter.
Spouses and relationship events
Children
Children with :

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48
Walter de Lindsay (-), Justiciar of Scotland2
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
He witnessed a charter to the Abbey of Ramsey in 1134. He also appears as witness to a charter granted in the Parliament of Scotland of 1147, and as witness to many charters of King David I. He granted lands at Ercildun or Earlston, and at Caddyslea to the Abbey of Dryburgh.3
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Crawford, p. 1-2, Walter de Lindsay.
2 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Crawford, p. 2, William de Lindsay.
3 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.