Henrik Gertsen Kramer (1675-)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Gjert Kramer (-), stadshauptmand
Mother:2(Unknown) (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Children
Children with Clarche Dodt:
Gjert Kramer (-before 1742)3
Herman Kramer (-), skipper4
Jan (Johan) Hendrichsen Kramer (Cramer) (around 1711-30 September 1775), merchant5
Attributes
Events
Born:61675Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Baptised:726 February 1675Nykirken [Unknown/Unspecified], Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1668-1820 (1308M8)", Database, Digitalarkivet (https://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001079157.
2 , , , p. 1008, Giert Kramer, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
3 , , , p. 476-78, Clarchie Jansdatter Dodt, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1668-1820 (1308M8)", Database, Digitalarkivet (https://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001079157.
7 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.