Johanna Frantsdatter Wolff (around 1655-1743)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Johane Vulfs11692
Johanne Wulv2
Parents
Father:3
Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48
Frantz Wolff "gammel" (-1691), shoemaker
Mother:4Catharina Clausdatter Schreuder (-after 31 July 1696)
The relationship seems likely as Johanna was godmother of Frøchen Hermansdatter Schrøder's son Israel Tiller. Johanna and Frøchen was probably cousins.
Spouses and relationship events
Married:512 July 1674Herman Wolff (-before 23 October 1707), brewerKorskirken [Unknown/Unspecified], Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Children
Children with Herman Wolff:
Birgitte (Berthe) Hermansdatter Wolff (late 1675-)
Frantz Wolff (1678-after 1707)
Petter Wolf (1681-)
Cathrine (Trine) Wolff (1682-1718)6
Giert Wolff (before 1683-)7
Peter Wolff (1685-1690)8
Maria Wolff (1688-before 1707)9
Peter Wolff (1692-1693)10
Attributes
Events
Born:11around 1655
Died:121743
Funeral:131 August 1743Korskirken [Unknown/Unspecified], Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Probate:1431 August 1743
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 , "Ministerialbok for Korskirken prestegjeld 1688-1697 (1301M2): Fødte og døpte b 1688-1697", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001079954.
2 , "Ministerialbok for Korskirken prestegjeld 1731-1785 (1301M2): Døde og begravde b 1731-1785", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hg00000000424957.
3 , , , p. 815, Frantz Wulf, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
4 , "Ministerialbok for Korskirken prestegjeld 1688-1697 (1301M2): Fødte og døpte b 1688-1697", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001079799.
5 , "Ministerialbok for Korskirken prestegjeld 1674-1688 (1301M2)", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hv00000000022158.
6 A. M. Wiesener, Stamtavle over slekten Friele: (Bergen: , 1934), p. 21.
7 , "Koppskatt 1683 for Bergen", Database, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet : ), ot00000000119270.
8 , "Ministerialbok for Korskirken prestegjeld 1674-1688 (1301M2)", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001866249.
9 , "Ministerialbok for Korskirken prestegjeld 1674-1688 (1301M2)", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001052827.
10 , "Ministerialbok for Korskirken prestegjeld 1688-1697 (1301M2): Fødte og døpte b 1688-1697", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001079954.
11 , "Ministerialbok for Korskirken prestegjeld 1731-1785 (1301M2): Døde og begravde b 1731-1785", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hg00000000424957.
12 Ibid
13 Ibid
14 A. M. Wiesener, Stamtavle over slekten Friele: (Bergen: , 1934), p. 21.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.