Anne de Bourbon (-September 1408)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Jean de Bourbon (1344-10 June 1393), Comte de Vendôme et de Castres
Mother:2Catherine de Vendôme (-1 April 1412), Ctss de Vendôme et de Castres
Spouses and relationship events
Married:31390Jean de Berry (4 February 1377-1397 before 17 November), Comte de Montpensier
Married:41 October 1402Ludwig VII "der Bärtige" (-1/2 May 1447), Duke of Bavaria-IngolstadtParis [city/town], Île-de-France [county], France [country]
Children
Children with Ludwig VII "der Bärtige":
Ludwig VIII "der Höckrige" (1 September 1403-7 April 1445), Duke of Bavaria-Ingolstadt5
Johann von Bayern-Ingolstadt (1404-1404)6
Attributes
Events
Buried:7Paris [city/town], Île-de-France [county], France [country]
In "église des Jacobins".
Died:8September 1408Paris [city/town], Île-de-France [county], France [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Vendôme.
2 Ibid
3 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), France, Capetian Kings.
4 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Bavaria, Dukes.
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.