Sir James Sandilands of Calder (around 1482-December 1559)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1John Sandilands (-)
Mother:2Elizabeth Scrimgeour (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3before February 1507-8Mariota (or Marion or Marjorie) Forrester (-March 1562)
Children
Children with Mariota (or Marion or Marjorie) Forrester:
John Sandilands of Calder (-around 1565)4
James Sandilands (-29 September 1579), 1. Lord Torphichen5
Alison Sandilands (-21 October 1584)6
Margaret Sandilands (-)7
Agnes Sandilands (-)8
Attributes
Events
Born:9around 1482
Died:10December 1559
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VIII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1911), Torphichen, p. 385, John Sandilands.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VIII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1911), Torphichen, p. 385-86, James Sandilands.
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.