Patrick Kincaid if that Ilk (-after 3 July 1505)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Spouses and relationship events
Married:1Egidia Houston (-after 3 July 1505)
Children
Children with Egidia Houston:
Elizabeth Kincaid of that Ilk (-)2
Attributes
Events
Died:3after 3 July 1505
Died:4before 4 April 1516
Personal Info
He is probably the one who is a witness in Edinburgh 27 July 1202.5
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 James Balfour Paul, The Register of the Great Seal of Scotland 1424-1513: Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum (Edinburgh: H. M. General Register House, 1882), No. 2861.
2 Peter Anthony Kincaid, "The Lairds of Kincaid and Craiglockhart castle: ," http://www.kyncades.org/ (2014): , p. 8.
3 M. Livingstone, The Register of the Privy Seal of Scotland vol I 1488-1529: Registrum Secreti Sigilli Regum Scotorum (Edinburgh: H. M. General Register House, 1908), No. 1106, p. 161.
4 John Anderson and Francis J. Grant, Protocol Book of Gavin Ros, N. P. 1512-1532: Scottish Record Society vol. 29 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1908), No. 134, p. 21.
5 James Balfour Paul, The Register of the Great Seal of Scotland 1424-1513: Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum (Edinburgh: H. M. General Register House, 1882), No. 1202.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.