David Lindsay of Edzell (-1744)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1David Lindsay of Edzell (-17 February 1698)
Mother:2Agnes Graham (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Children
Attributes
Events
Died:31744Kirkwall [Unknown/Unspecified], Orkney [county], Scotland [country], United Kingdom [country]
Personal Info
He served heir as Baron of Glenesk 25 April 1699. He became deeply embarrassed and sold his extensive barony, extending over the whole north of Forfarshire from near Brechin to Invermark and Mount Keen, for £192,502, 10s. 8d. Scots to James, Earl of Panmure. The Earl, who bought the barony with the view of maintaining the Jacobite interest, was forfeited for the Rising of 1715, but the Panmure estates, including Glenesk, were repurchased, and now belong to the Earl of Dalhousie. The last years of Edzell were spent in obscurity and in some not very creditable litigation. He is said to have been an ostler at Kirkwall in Orkney before his death there in 1744. In him ended the male line of Sir David, eldest son of the ninth Earl of Crawford, and the representation of the Earls, together with all right to the chiefship and barony of Lindsay, devolved upon James, fifth Earl of Balcarres.4
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Balcarres, p. 515-16, David Lindsay.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Balcarres, p. 516, David Lindsay.
4 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.