Sir John Bruce of Airth (-1622 or before)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1William Bruce of Airth (-February 1596)
Mother:2Jean Fleming (-October 1630)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3around 1600Margaret Elphinstone (7 June 1588-before 1628)
Marriage contract dated 27 March 1597, and the wedding was supposed to be arranged before 16 March 1601.
Children
Children with Margaret Elphinstone:
Christian Bruce (-)4
Sir Alexander Bruce of Airth (-September 1665), Laird of Airth5
John Bruce (-before 19 February 1631)6
Michael Bruce (-)7
Jean Bruce (-)8
Helen Bruce (-)9
Marion Bruce (-)10
Janet Bruce (-)11
Margaret Bruce (-)12
Mary Bruce (-)13
Rebecca Bruce (-)14
Elizabeth Bruce (-)15
Attributes
Events
Died:161622 or before
Personal Info
As the eldest son of William Bruce, and heir-apparent of Airth, he succeeded his grandfather Sir Alexander in Airth 1600. He is served heir to his great-great-great-grandfather "Tritavus", Alexander Bruce of Stenhouse, 18 June 1601, and on same date to his great-great-grandfather. Sir Robert Bruce "Abavus", and again to the same' on 29 August 1598, and to his grandfather Sir Alexander "Avus" 18 June 1601. Sir Alexander Bruce, before the death of his eldest son William, appears to have been anxious to arrange for the marriage of his grandson and heir, and a contract of marriage was entered into with the Lord Elphinstone and his son the Master of Elphinstone, as follows: ''It is contracted and agreed between Robert, lord Elphinstone, Alexander, master of Elphinstone, and Margaret, third lawful daughter of Alexander, on the one side, and Sir Alexander Brus of Airth, Dame Janet Livingstone, lady Airth, his spouse, and John Brus their oy [grandson], eldest son of umquhile William Brus, younger of Airth, on the other part, whereby the said John sall marrie, God willing, and take to his lawful spouse the said Margaret Elphinstoun, and sail solempnizat and compleit the band of matrimony with her iu face of hohe kirk witli all solempnities requisit betwixt the date heirof and sixteen dale of March 1601, With the substitution of the brother and sister of each respectively in the event of either predeceasing. Dated at the places of Airth and Elphinstoun, 22 March 1597." This family arrangement was made a year after the death of William Bruce, John's father, who, as will be seen from his will, was agreeable to and anxious that the proposed marriage should take place, which it accordingly did in 1601, Margaret's father being then the Master of Elphinstone, but he became Lord Elphinstone the year after. Sir John appears to have been an extravagant man, and to have completed the ruin of the family, as he sold the estate to the Earl of Linlithgow before 1620, but apparently with some condition of redemption, as his son Alexander, having married a wealthy lady in Holland, was enabled to redeem the estate. Sir John Bruce will be found mentioned in many transactions.17
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 William Bruce Armstrong, The Bruces of Airth and their Cadets: (Edinburgh: , 1892), Bruces of Airth. p. 12-22.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Elphinstone, p. 536-40, IV Alexander Elphinstone.
4 Peter Beauclerk Dewar, Burke's Landed Gentry of Great Britain - The Kingdom in Scotland 19th Edition Volume 1: Together with Members of the Titled and Non-titled Contemporary Establishment (Wilmington, Delaware, USA: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, 2001), Innes of Balvenie, p. 709-16.
5 William Bruce Armstrong, The Bruces of Airth and their Cadets: (Edinburgh: , 1892), Bruces of Airth. p. 12-22.
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
13 Ibid
14 Ibid
15 Ibid
16 Ibid
17 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.