Janet Pitcairn of Skerpo (-)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Andrew Pitcairn of Scarpoe (1604 or later-before 13 September 1642)
Mother:2Elizabeth Bruce (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:31655James Scott of Voesgarth (3 May 1642-11 September 1695)
Children
Children with James Scott of Voesgarth:
John Scott of Scarpoe (-1724)4
James Scott of Voesgarth (-15 November 1716), commissioner of Supply for Shetland5
Andrew Scott (-)6
Elizabeth Scott (-)7
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
She served heir to her grandfather on 13 September 1642, in 195 1/2 merks land in Unst, 12 in Fetlar, and 25 1/2 in North Yell.8
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 , Retours of Services of Heirs 1544-1699, volume I-III: Inquisitionum ad capellam domini regis retornatarum abbreviatio (: The House of Commons of Great Britain, 1811), Generales no. 2741.
2 Francis J. Grant, The County Families of the Zetland Islands: Being Genealogies of Local Families Compiled from Public Records and Other Sources (Lerwick: T. & J. Manson, 1893), Pitcairn of Skerpoe no. II, p. 214-15.
3 Francis J. Grant, The County Families of the Zetland Islands: Being Genealogies of Local Families Compiled from Public Records and Other Sources (Lerwick: T. & J. Manson, 1893), Pitcairn of Skerpoe no. III, p. 215.
4 Francis J. Grant, The County Families of the Zetland Islands: Being Genealogies of Local Families Compiled from Public Records and Other Sources (Lerwick: T. & J. Manson, 1893), Scott of Voesgarth no. II, p. 225-26.
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 , Retours of Services of Heirs 1544-1699, volume I-III: Inquisitionum ad capellam domini regis retornatarum abbreviatio (: The House of Commons of Great Britain, 1811), Orkney et Shetland, no. 33.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.