Sir Walter Leslie (-27 February 1381-2)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Sir Andrew Leslie of that Ilk (-between April 1320 and 28 November 1324), Laird of Leslie
Mother:2Maria Abernethy (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:31366Euphemia of Ross (-1394), Countess of Ross
They had a Papal dispensation on 24 November 1366, but were evidently married before that date
Children
Children with Euphemia of Ross:
Alexander Leslie (-8 May 1402), Earl of Ross4
Mary (Margaret) Leslie (-1440)5
Attributes
Events
Died:627 February 1381-2Perth [parish], Perthshire [county], Scotland [country], United Kingdom [country]
Personal Info
He is said to have been one of the foremost knights of his time, and served with great distinction against the Saracens.7
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Ross, p. 239-41, Euphemia.
2 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Rothes, p. 268-71, Andrew Leslie.
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Ross, p. 239-41, Euphemia.
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.