Bertha (Judith) von Staufen (-1194/95)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Friedrich II “der Einäugige” (1090-4 or 6 April 1147), Duke of Swabia
Mother:2Judith of Bavaria (after 1100-22 February around 1130/31)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3before 25 March 1139Mathieu I (1119-13 May 1176), Duke of Lorraine
Children
Children with Mathieu I:
Judith de Lorraine (-19 March after 1173)4
Simon II (-1 April 1206), Duke of Lorraine5
Mathieu de Lorraine (-1207 or before), Comte de Toul6
Thierry de Lorraine (-1181), Bishop of Metz7
(Unknown) de Lorraine (-)8
Alix de Lorraine (1145-)9
Ferry I (before 1155-7 April 1206), Duke of Lorraine10
Attributes
Events
Buried:11Abbaye de Clairlieu [building], Villers-lès-Nancy [municipality], Meurthe-et-Moselle [district], Lorraine [county], France [country]
Died:121194/95
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 3 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : 20 July 2016), Swabia, Dukes.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Lorraine.
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 3 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : 20 July 2016), Swabia, Dukes.
12 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.