Colin Campbell (-10 September 1584), 6. Earl of Argyll

Same as
Additional names
Sir Colin Campbell of Boquhan1
Parents
Father:2Archibald Campbell (-1558), 4. Earl of Argyll
Mother:3Margaret Graham (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:4before 14 October 1551Janet Stewart (-)
They had a charter of Balquhidder, co. Perth, 14 October 1551, following on a marriage-contract of the same date, in which Colin is taken bound to marry her as soon as he and she should be of full contracting age.
Married:51571Agnes Keith (-16 July 1588)
Between May 1571 and 26 February 1571-72.
Children
Children with Agnes Keith:
Colin Campbell of Lundie (-)6
Annas/Anna Campbell (-)7
Archibald Campbell 'Gruamach' (the Grim) (1575-1638), 7. Earl of Argyll8
Attributes
Occupation:96. Earl of Argyll
Events
Died:1010 September 1584Darnaway Castle [building], Darnaway Forest [Unknown/Unspecified], Elginshire (Moray) [county], Scotland [country], United Kingdom [country]
Personal Info
He was styled Sir Colin Campbell of Boquhan, and received a charter of those lands, 8 August 1546, he also had a charter of the lands of Easter Leckie, or Shirgarten, co. Stirling, 21 July 1548, where he is described as second son of Archibald, Earl of Argyll. He obtained six charters, to 'Sir Colin Campbell of Bochquhan, knight, brother of Archibald, Earl of Argyll, of Lome, Lochow, Durror, Auchnagarran, Pincartoun, etc., and the local hereditary offices, dated 10 February 1571-72, and succeeded his brother 1573.11
In 1576 a quarrel having arisen between Argyll and the Earl of Atholl, a charge was sent them that they should keep the peace, and they were summoned to appear before the Regent Morton and the Council at Holyrood on 16 November 1576, with not more than sixty followers each. Before that time, however, on 20 July, Argyll gave a formal engagement not to molest in any way the people or lands of Atholl ; but this did not obviate the necessity of hearing the grounds of quarrel by the Council. The day originally fixed seems to have been extended to 20 January 1576-77, and then it was found that both nobles had come to Edinburgh with so large a retinue that there was serious danger of a violent outbreak. Proclamation was therefore made that no weapons were to be worn by those assembled, and that the two Earls were to refrain from all hostilities.12
Morton was not able to proceed in the matter further, and Argyll and Atholl thenceforward became the leaders of that coalition against him which resulted in his resignation in March 1577-78. Within nine months, however, he succeeded in reinstating himself in power. But he had a formidable opposition to deal with, and so great was the feeling against him that a civil war seemed imminent: this extremity was obviated by the mediation of Bowes, the English ambassador, and a treaty of accommodation was concluded on terms of mutual concession. Argyll was continued in the Council as Justice-General, and agreed to co-operate with Morton, an agreement which resulted in his being elected Chancellor 17 August 1579. He accompanied the King in his entry to Edinburgh 30 September 1579. He was lieutenant of the West Marches in 1580, and sat on the trial of the Regent Morton in June of the following year. He took part on 2 May 1584 in another trial of note, that of the Earl of Gowrie, the leader of the 4 Ruthven Raid,' who paid the penalty of his rashness with his life, being executed on the night of his trial below Stirling Castle. By this time, however, Argyll's health was failing: in the Parliament which sat at Edinburgh in May 1584 Arran was appointed Chancellor in his absence, and he did not live long afterwards, dying on 10 September 1584 at Darnaway, where he made his will on the fifth of same month.13
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Argyll, p. 344-46, VI Colin Campbell.
2 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Argyll, p. 338-40, IV Archibald Campbell.
3 Ibid
4 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Argyll, p. 344-46, VI Colin Campbell.
5 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume VI: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909), Moray, p. 313-16, James Stewart.
6 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Argyll, p. 344-46, VI Colin Campbell.
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume VI: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909), Marischal, p. 46-51, IV William Keith.
10 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Argyll, p. 344-46, VI Colin Campbell.
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
13 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.