Abraham Kinch (Kincaid?) (-), ombudsman for the hospital in Bergen

Same as
Additional names
Abraham Kinchet1
which is most likely how he himself spelled his name.
Parents
Spouses and relationship events
Children
Attributes
Occupation:21622jury member (lagrettsmann)Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Occupation:31643ombudsman for the hospital in BergenBergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Events
Burgess:4Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
but he is not found in the burgess rolls.
Residence:51622-30Øksnes kommune [municipality], Nordland [county], Norway [country]
It is not clear exactly where he lived, but it might have been Bernfarøya which original name may have been "Bergensfarøya", i.e. the place of a shopkeeper from Bergen.
Personal Info
2 January 1638 he was in Bergen and co-founded a fund for helping poor widows and orphans. The founding letter says all are sworn burgesses of Bergen.6
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Borgermester Meyer, edited by B. E. Bendixen, Samlinger til den Berømmelige og Navnkundige Norske Handel Stad Bergens Beskrivelse: (Bergen: Bergens historiske forening, 1904), XXXI, no. 8, p. 566-70.
2 Oddvar Grønli, Norske Herredags-Dombøger, Tillegg til 1.-4. rekke, bind I: (Oslo: Styret for Kjeldeskriftfondet, 1966), p. 203.
3 Jakob M. Bjørlykke og Olav Liset, Soga um Sande og Rovde bind 1: (: Sande og Rovde sogenemnd, 1935), p. 180-81, Røynestad.
4 , Gård og slekt i Øksnes Bind I: (: Øksnes historielag, ), Andsletta, p. 44-45.
5 Ibid
6 Borgermester Meyer, edited by B. E. Bendixen, Samlinger til den Berømmelige og Navnkundige Norske Handel Stad Bergens Beskrivelse: (Bergen: Bergens historiske forening, 1904), XXXI, no. 8, p. 566-70.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.