Cornelische Gottfredsdatter Bang (-1700)

Same as
Additional names
Conelesche Conelesche Bang1
Parents
Father:2Godtfred Christensen Bang (-)
Mother:3Else Jochumsdatter Surbech (-1679)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:4Johan (Jan) Doodt (-around 1698)
Married:5around 1699Johan Henrichsen Forman (around 1662-1725), merchant
Children
Children with Johan (Jan) Doodt:
Else Jansdatter Doodt (1685-1712)6
Clarche Dodt (around 1688-1746)7
Children with Johan Henrichsen Forman:
Johan Cornelius Jansen Forman (around 1700-1739)8
Attributes
Events
Died:91700
Funeral:103 November 1700Nykirken [Unknown/Unspecified], Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Probate:1131 August 1701
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 A. M. Wiesener, "Slekten Danchertsen: ," Bergens historiske forenings skrifter 40 (1934): 101-34, p. 133.
2 A. M. Wiesener, "Slegten de Langes ældre led i Bergen: ," Bergens historiske forening. Skrifter. 38 (1932): 379-418, V, p. 392-402.
3 Ibid
4 A. M. Wiesener, "Slekten Danchertsen: ," Bergens historiske forenings skrifter 40 (1934): 101-34, p. 133.
5 Anthon Mohr Wiesener and Vilh. H. Finsen, Stamtavle over Slegten Forman (Formann): (Bergen and Kjøbenhavn: , 1917), p. 10.
6 A. M. Wiesener, "Slekten Danchertsen: ," Bergens historiske forenings skrifter 40 (1934): 101-34, p. 133.
7 Anthon Mohr Wiesener and Vilh. H. Finsen, Stamtavle over Slegten Forman (Formann): (Bergen and Kjøbenhavn: , 1917), p. 10.
8 Anthon Mohr Wiesener and Vilh. H. Finsen, Stamtavle over Slegten Forman (Formann): (Bergen and Kjøbenhavn: , 1917), p. 12.
9 Anthon Mohr Wiesener and Vilh. H. Finsen, Stamtavle over Slegten Forman (Formann): (Bergen and Kjøbenhavn: , 1917), p. 10.
10 Ibid
11 A. M. Wiesener, "Slekten Danchertsen: ," Bergens historiske forenings skrifter 40 (1934): 101-34, p. 133.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.