Sir Patrick Hepburn of Waughton (-1547)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1(Unknown) Hepburn (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:25 November 1510Helen Hepburn (-before 29 April 1560)
Dspensation granted by Alexander, Archbishop of St. Andrews, which was rendered necessary by the fact that the parties were related in the third and fourth, or fourth and fourth degrees of consanguinity. How they were related is not known.
Children
Children with Helen Hepburn:
Patrick Hepburn of Waughton (-after August 1597)3
William Hepburn of Gilmerton, Crashaws and Cracho (-)4
Attributes
Events
Died:51547
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Bothwell, p. 161-67, V James Hepburn.
2 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Bothwell, p. 148-50, Adam Hepburn.
3 Ibid
4 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Bothwell, p. 161-67, V James Hepburn.
5 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Bothwell, p. 148-50, Adam Hepburn.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.