William Boyd (around 1663-64-20 May 1692), 2. Earl of Kilmarnock |
|
|
| |||
Father:1 | William Boyd (-March 1692), 1. Earl of Kilmarnock | ||
Mother:2 | Jean Cunningham (-) |
| |||||
Married:3 | July 1682 | Letitia/Lettice Boyd (-) |
| ||
Children with Letitia/Lettice Boyd: | ||
Mary Boyd (-)4 | ||
William Boyd (1683 or 1684-1717), 3. Earl of Kilmarnock5 | ||
Robert Boyd (13 September 1689-February 1716), advocate6 |
| |||||
Occupation:7 | 2. Earl of Kilmarnock |
| ||||
Born:8 | around 1663-64 | |||
Died:9 | 20 May 1692 |
| ||
Styled Lord Boyd during his father's lifetime, a Commissioner of Supply for the shires of Ayr and Dumbarton 13 May 1685, 28 May 1686, 27 April 1689, and 7 June 1690. He succeeded his father, March 1692, but only survived him two months, dying 20 May following, aged about twenty-nine.10 |
|
|
certainly | The information is supported by primary sources. |
probably | The information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources. |
possibly | It is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence. |
likely | The information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence. |
apparently | The information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct. |
perhaps | The information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption. |
disproved | The information is proven to be wrong. |