Ernst August (20 November 1629-13/23 January 1698), Elector of Hanover

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Georg (17 February 1582-2 April 1641), Herzog von Braunschweig-Lüneburg in Calenberg
Mother:2Anna Eleonore von Hessen-Darmstadt (30 July 1601-6 May 1659)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:330 September 1658Sophie von der Pfalz (13 October 1630-8 June 1714)
Married:417 October 1658Sophie von der Pfalz (13 October 1630-8 June 1714)Heidelberg [city/town], Baden-Württemberg [state], Germany [country]
Children
Children with Sophie von der Pfalz:
George I (28 May 1660-11 June 1727), King of Great Britain5
Friedrich August von Braunschweig-Lüneburg (4 October 1661-)6
(Unknown) von Braunschweig-Lüneburg (April 1665-April 1665)7
(Unknown) von Braunschweig-Lüneburg (April 1665-April 1665)8
Sophie Charlotte von Braunschweig-Lüneburg (10 October 1668-1 February 1705)9
Karl Philipp von Braunschweig-Lüneburg (13 October 1669-1 January 1690)10
Christian von Braunschweig-Lüneburg (29 September 1671-31 July 1702)11
Ernst August von Braunschweig-Lüneburg (7/18 September 1674-14 August 1728), Duke of York and Albany12
Children with Franz Ernst:
Sophie Charlotte (1673-20 April 1725)13
Attributes
Occupation:14from 1662Bishop of OsnabrückOsnabrück [city/town], Lower Saxony [state], Germany [country]
Occupation:15from 1679Duke of Brunswick-Luneburg in Hannover
Occupation:16from 22 March 1692Elector of Hanover
Events
Buried:17Hanover [city/town], Lower Saxony [state], Germany [country]
In Hannover Schloßkirche.
Born:1820 November 1629Herzberg am Harz [city/town], Göttingen (district) [county], Lower Saxony [state], Germany [country]
Died:1913/23 January 1698Herrenhausen [Unknown/Unspecified], Hanover [city/town], Lower Saxony [state], Germany [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Brunswick.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Scotland, p. 26-28, James VI.
4 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Brunswick.
5 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Scotland, p. 26-28, James VI.
6 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Brunswick.
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
13 Ibid
14 Ibid
15 Ibid
16 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Scotland, p. 26-28, James VI.
17 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Brunswick.
18 Ibid
19 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Scotland, p. 26-28, James VI.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.