James Stewart 'secundus' (1531-21 January 1569-70), 1. Earl of Moray

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1James V (10 April 1512-14 December 1542), King of Scots
Mother:2Margaret Erskine (-5 May 1572)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:310 February 1561-2Agnes Keith (-16 July 1588)St Giles' Cathedral (High Kirk of Edinburgh) [building], Edinburgh [city/town], Edinburghshire (Midlothian) [county], Scotland [country], United Kingdom [country]
Contract 7 February 1561-62. (Scots Peerage vol VI, p. 46-51.)
Children
Children with Agnes Keith:
Margaret Stewart (-before January 1586-7)4
Elizabeth Stewart (-18 November 1591), Countess of Moray5
Annabel Stewart (-before November 1572)6
Attributes
Occupation:7from 1538Prior of St. Andrews
Occupation:8from 22 August 1562Regent of Scotland
Occupation:9from 7 February 1561-2Earl of Mar
He resigned that earldom a few months later
Occupation:1030 January 1561-21. Earl of Moray
As the Earl of Huntly had had a grant of the same earldom in February 1548-49, and was not yet forfeited, though he had been deprived of his Chancellorship and of the lands of the earldom, the creation was not made public.
Events
Born:111531
Died:1221 January 1569-70Linlithgow [city/town], Linlithgow (West Lothian) [county], Scotland [country], United Kingdom [country]
He was assassinated by James Hamilton of Bothwellhaugh.
Buried:1314 February 1569-70St Giles' Cathedral (High Kirk of Edinburgh) [building], Edinburgh [city/town], Edinburghshire (Midlothian) [county], Scotland [country], United Kingdom [country]
Personal Info
He was illegitimate, but had letters of legitimation on 7 February 1550-51.14
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Scotland, p. 23-25, James V.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume VI: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909), Marischal, p. 46-51, IV William Keith.
4 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume VI: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909), Moray, p. 313-16, James Stewart.
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Scotland, p. 23-25, James V.
8 Ibid
9 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume VI: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909), Moray, p. 313-16, James Stewart.
10 Ibid
11 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Scotland, p. 23-25, James V.
12 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume VI: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909), Moray, p. 313-16, James Stewart.
13 Ibid
14 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.