Magdalene Carnegie (-November 1645)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Sir David Carnegie of Kinnaird and Colluthie (1575-end of February 1658), 1. Earl of Southesk
Mother:2Margaret Lindsay (-9 July 1614)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:310 November 1629James Graham (-), 1. Marquess of Montrose
By their marriage-contract, dated 1 November 1629, Magdalene was infeft in the liferent of the lands and barony of Old Montrose, the lands of Fullartone, and 'thrid pairt landis of Ananie,' and the lands of Marietoun with fishings, etc. Her tocher was £40,000 Scots. It was further arranged that the young Marquess and his wife should live at Kinnaird for the first three years after their marriage. The Marquess was only seventeen years of age at the time of his marriage.
Children
Attributes
Events
Died:4November 1645
Personal Info
She was her parents' youngest daughter.5
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VIII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1911), Southesk, p. 64-68, I Sir David Carnegie of Kinnaird and Colluthie.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.