Jean/Janet Grant (around Michaelmas 1597-)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1John Grant of Freuchie (around 1568-20 September 1622), 5. Laird of Freuchie
Mother:2Lilias Murray (-end of 1643 or early 1644)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:31612William Sutherland of Duffus (-21 October 1626)
Contract 19 September 1612.
Married:4after 1626Thomas Mackenzie of Pluscarden (-)
Children
Children with William Sutherland of Duffus:
William Sutherland of Inverhassie (-after 1694)5
John Sutherland (-before 23 January 1658), lieutenant-colonel6
Anna Sutherland (-after 1663)7
Sir Alexander Sutherland (December 1621-31 August 1674), 1. Lord Duffus8
Attributes
Events
Born:9around Michaelmas 1597
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Seafield, p. 466-69, John Grant.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Duffus, p. 205-207, William Sutherland.
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Seafield, p. 466-69, John Grant.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.