Anne Poulsdatter (around 1708-before 6 September 1740)

Same as
Additional names
Ana Paulsdatter1
Parents
Father:2Poul Matzen (-before 14 January 1711)
Mother:3Christine Christensdatter (-before 10 December 1743)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:4Otto Nevermann (-)
Children
Children with Otto Nevermann:
Kirsten Nevermann (around 1738-)5
Attributes
Events
Born:6around 1708
Probate:76 September 1740Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Died:8before 6 September 1740
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 , , , p. 270, Ana Paulsdatter, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
2 , , , p. 1143, Poul Matzen, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
3 Ibid
4 , , , p. 270, Ana Paulsdatter, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
5 Ibid
6 , , , p. 1143, Poul Matzen, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
7 , , , p. 270, Ana Paulsdatter, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
8 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.