Sir John Ogilvy of Lintrathen and Airlie (-June 1489)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Mother:1Isabel (-)
Father:2Sir Walter Ogilvy of Carcary and Lintrathen (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3Margaret (-around 1471)
Children
Children with Margaret:
Sir James Ogilvy of Airlie (-around 1504), 1. Lord Ogilvy of Airlie4
David Ogilvy of Newtoun (-)5
Thomas Ogilvy (-), Abbot of Cowpar6
Christian Ogilvy (-)7
Elizabeth Ogilvy (-)8
Marion Ogilvy (-)9
Margaret Ogilvy (-)10
Attributes
Events
Died:11June 1489
Personal Info
He is also said to have married Marion, second daughter of Sir William Seton of Seton, or William, Lord Seton, but there is no authority given for this statement.12
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Airlie, p. 111-13, Walter Ogilvy.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume VI: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909), Moray, p. 302-303, II Thomas Dunbar.
4 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Airlie, p. 113-14, John Ogilvy.
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.