Jean Cuninghame (-)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1John Cuninghame of Geise and Brownhill (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:2William Sinclair of Ratter (-after 4 May 1663)
Married:31632Alexander Sinclair of Latheron (-before 1647)
Children
Children with William Sinclair of Ratter:
James Sinclair of Freswick (-)4
Robert Sinclair (-before 1696)5
David Sinclair (-)6
Janet Sinclair (-)7
Anne Sinclair (-)8
Children with Alexander Sinclair of Latheron:
George Sinclair of Barrock (-)9
Jean Sinclair (-)10
John Sinclair of Brabstermyre (-12 January 1690)11
Alexander Sinclair of Stemster (-)12
Elizabeth Sinclair (-)13
Margaret Sinclair (-)14
William Sinclair of Dunbeath, Latheron and Geanies (-1690)15
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Caithness, p. 348, William Sinclair.
2 Ibid
3 John Henderson, Caithness Family History: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1884), Sinclair of Dunbeath and Latheron no. I, p. 83-85.
4 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Caithness, p. 348, William Sinclair.
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 John Henderson, Caithness Family History: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1884), Sinclair of Dunbeath and Latheron no. I, p. 83-85.
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
13 Ibid
14 Ibid
15 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.