James Kennedy of Culzean (-between 1632 and 1637)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Sir Thomas Kennedy of Culzean (-11 May 1602)
Mother:2Elizabeth MacGill (-January 1622)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3Jane/Janet Stewart (-)
Children
Children with Jane/Janet Stewart:
James Kennedy (-)4
Children with Sir John Kennedy of Cullean:
Egidia Kennedy (-)5
Attributes
Events
Died:6between 1632 and 1637
He was alive on 5 April 1632, and died before 12 October 1637, when his son was retoured heir to him.
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Cassillis, p. 486-88, Thomas Kennedy.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume IV: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1907), Galloway, p. 158-59, Alexander Stewart.
4 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Cassillis, p. 488-89, Alexander Kennedy.
5 Charles Mosley, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage, and Knightage, Clan Chiefs, Scottish Feudal Barons, Volume II: 107th Edition (: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, 2003), Galloway, p. 1511-16.
6 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Cassillis, p. 486-88, Thomas Kennedy.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.