Jean Ramsay (-22 June 1607)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1George Ramsay of Dalhousie (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:2around 1572John Kincaid of Warriston (before 1524-28 September 1587)
Marriage contract dated 28 January 1571-72; tocher 1600 merks.
Children
Children with John Kincaid of Warriston:
Elizabeth Kincaid (-)3
William Kincaid (-)4
Agnes Kincaid (-September 1597)5
Thomas Kincaid (after 1573-before 17 March 1648)6
Attributes
Events
Died:722 June 1607
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Peter Anthony Kincaid, "Research notes on Scottish Kincaids collected by Peter Kincaid of Fredericton, NB, Canada: ," (23.07.2017): , p. 10.
2 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Dalhousie, p. 94-96, George Ramsay.
3 Peter Anthony Kincaid, "Research notes on Scottish Kincaids collected by Peter Kincaid of Fredericton, NB, Canada: ," (23.07.2017): , p. 12.
4 Peter Anthony Kincaid, "Research notes on Scottish Kincaids collected by Peter Kincaid of Fredericton, NB, Canada: ," (23.07.2017): , p. 25.
5 Peter Anthony Kincaid, "Research notes on Scottish Kincaids collected by Peter Kincaid of Fredericton, NB, Canada: ," (23.07.2017): , p. 26.
6 Peter Anthony Kincaid, "Research notes on Scottish Kincaids collected by Peter Kincaid of Fredericton, NB, Canada: ," (23.07.2017): , p. 28.
7 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.