Gjertrud Lahusen (-after 1730)

Same as
Additional names
Jertru Lausen1
Gertrud Lawson2
Parents
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3Mathias Ibsen (-1730)
Children
Children with Mathias Ibsen:
Anna Maria Ibsen (1723-1754)4
Jørgen Johan Ibsen (around 1724-)5
Tewes Ibsen (1726-1754), merchant6
Attributes
Events
Died:7after 1730
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1717-1764 (1308M8)", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001093327.
2 , "Ministerialbok for Korskirken prestegjeld 1720-1750 (1301M2): Fødte og døpte b 1720-1750", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://www.arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001117250.
3 , , , p. 1480, Mathias Ibsen, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
4 , , , p. 589, Thomas Ibsen, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
5 Ibid
6 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1717-1764 (1308M8)", Transcribed, Digitalarkivet (http://arkivverket.no/Digitalarkivet : ), hd00000001093327.
7 , , , p. 1480, Mathias Ibsen, ; Database, Skifteavskrifter for Bergen 1675-1852, fra Sollied. http://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet :
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.