Gunnhild Nilsdatter Lyse (1694-)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Spouses and relationship events
Married:130 June 1715Jens Kristensen Nedrebø (1694-17 March 1729), farmer
Married:21 January 1730Ingemund Torgersen Birkeland (1694-1771)
Children
Children with Jens Kristensen Nedrebø:
Gunnhild Jensdatter Åse (-)3
Synnøva Jensdatter Åse (1 August 1725-)4
Kristen Jensen Åse (27 February 1728-)5
Children with Ingemund Torgersen Birkeland:
Gunnhild Ingemundsdatter Sporaland (-)6
Magel Ingemundsdatter Sporaland (-)7
Gunnvor Ingemundsdatter Sporaland (1735-)8
Joren Ingemundsdatter Sporaland (1741-23 January 1829)9
Attributes
Events
Born:101694
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Ola Aurenes, Høyland gards- og ættesoge: Gjennom 400 år, 1500-1900 (: Høyland kommune, ), Åse no. 29, p. 468.
2 Ola Aurenes, Høyland gards- og ættesoge: Gjennom 400 år, 1500-1900 (: Høyland kommune, ), Sporaland no. 8, p. 377.
3 Ola Aurenes, Høyland gards- og ættesoge: Gjennom 400 år, 1500-1900 (: Høyland kommune, ), Åse no. 29, p. 468.
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ola Aurenes, Høyland gards- og ættesoge: Gjennom 400 år, 1500-1900 (: Høyland kommune, ), Sporaland no. 8, p. 377.
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ola Aurenes, Høyland gards- og ættesoge: Gjennom 400 år, 1500-1900 (: Høyland kommune, ), Åse no. 29, p. 468.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.