William Leask of that Ilk (-before 14 June 1637)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1
Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48
William Leask (-after 1588), minister of Dunottar
Spouses and relationship events
Married:2Isobel Ogilvie (-)
Married:3before 20 May 1590Elizabeth Keith (-)
Children
Children with Isobel Ogilvie:
Sara Leask (-)4
Children with Elizabeth Keith:
William Leask of that Ilk (-)5
Alexander Leask of that Ilk (-1674), Minister of Maryculter6
Nathaniel Leask (-after 1638)7
Attributes
Events
Died:8before 14 June 1637
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Charles Mosley, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage, and Knightage, Clan Chiefs, Scottish Feudal Barons, Volume I: 107th Edition (: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, ), Leask of Leask, p. 2270-72.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.