Anna Sophie Reventlow (16 April 1691-7 January 1743)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Spouses and relationship events
Married:14 April 1721Frederik IV (11 October 1671-12 October 1730), King of Denmark and NorwayCopenhagen Castle [building], Copenhagen [city/town], Sjælland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Children
Children with Frederik IV:
Christiane Amalie of Denmark (23 October 1723-7 January 1724)2
Frederik Christian of Denmark (1 June 1726-15 May 1727)3
Carl of Denmark (16 February 1728-8 July 1729)4
Attributes
Events
Buried:5Roskilde Cathedral [building], Roskilde [city/town], Sømme Herred [municipality], Sjælland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Born:616 April 1691Clausholm Palace [building], Clausholm [Unknown/Unspecified], Voldum Sogn [parish], Galten Herred [municipality], Åbosyssel [county], Jylland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Died:77 January 1743Clausholm Palace [building], Clausholm [Unknown/Unspecified], Voldum Sogn [parish], Galten Herred [municipality], Åbosyssel [county], Jylland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Denmark, Kings.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.