Elisabeth Sophie Marie of Schleswig-Holstein-Sønderborg-Nordborg (2/12 September 1683-3 April 1767)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Rudolf Frederik of Schleswig-Holstein-Sønderborg-Nordborg (27 September 1645-14 November 1688)
Mother:2Bibiana von Promnitz (8 August 1649-19 August 1685)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:38 January 1701Adolf August (29 March 1680-29 June 1704), Duke of Schleswig-Holstein-Sønderborg-PlönWolfenbüttel [city/town], Wolfenbüttel [county], Lower Saxony [state], Germany [country]
Married:412 September 1710August Wilhelm (8 August 1662-23 March 1731), Duke of Braunschweig-WolfenbüttelAhrensbök [municipality], Ostholstein [county], Schleswig-Holstein [state], Germany [country]
Children
Attributes
Events
Buried:5Beatae Mariae Virginis (Wolfenbüttel) [building], Wolfenbüttel [city/town], Wolfenbüttel [county], Lower Saxony [state], Germany [country]
Born:62/12 September 1683Wolfenbüttel [city/town], Wolfenbüttel [county], Lower Saxony [state], Germany [country]
Died:73 April 1767Brunswick [city/town], Lower Saxony [state], Germany [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Schleswig-Holstein.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.