Mungo Grant of Kinchirdie (-)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Sir John Grant of Freuchie (17 August 1596-1 April 1637), 6. Laird of Freuchie
Mother:2Mary Ogilvy (-after 1646)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3Margaret Gordon (-)
Married:4around 1664Elizabeth Grant (-)
Marriage contract dated 12 May 1664.
Children
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
He is called of Kinchirdie, but sometimes also of Duthil and of Gellovie. In a discharge, dated March 1654, to his eldest brother, James Grant of Freuchie, he styles himself fifth lawful surviving son to the deceased Sir John Grant of Freuchie. He is designed as ' of Duthil ' in 1663, also 'of Gellovey' in 1667. He obtained, on 11 June 1667, from David Cumming of Kinchirdie a disposition (in which he is designated as in Duthil) of the lands of Kinchirdie, and also of Avielochan and Delnahaitnich. He was for some time Chamberlain and Factor to his nephew Ludovick Grant of Freuchie. In 1670 he was admonished to beware of popish leanings, his intention of sending two of his sons to France, to be educated there by 'one Father Grant, a seminarie priest,' having been reported. The Synod of Moray warned him not to do so, as he would be answerable to the Lords of Council if he did. His brother James, seventh of Freuchie, on his death, appointed him one of the tutors and administrators of his children. His testament is dated at Kinchirdie 28 December 1679.5
He had issue by both his wives, and was the ancestor of the Grants of Kinchirdie, Gellovie, Knockando, and the later Grants of Gartenbeg.6
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Seafield, p. 469-73, John Grant.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.