Jane Duff (-15 February 1805)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Alexander Duff of Hatton (-)
Mother:2Anne Duff (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:34 January 1763Sir James Grant of Grant (19 May 1737-18 February 1811)Bath [city/town], Somerset [county], England [country], United Kingdom [country]
Children
Children with Sir James Grant of Grant:
Alexander Grant (-21 March 1772)4
Magdalen Grant (-after 1796)5
Mary Sophia Grant (-26 February 1788)6
Anne Margaret Grant (25 July 1764-23 November 1827)7
Sir Lewis Alexander Grant Ogilvie (22 March 1767-26 October 1840), 5. Earl of Seafield8
Margaret Grant (27 May 1772-3 December 1830)9
Jane Grant (1 March 1774-22 May 1819)10
James Thomas Grant (10 August 1776-28 July 1804)11
Sir Francis William Grant (6 March 1778-30 July 1853), 6. Earl of Seafleld12
Penuel Grant (21 November 1779-27 January 1844)13
Christina Teresa Grant (13 January 1781-16 July 1793)14
Robert Henry Grant (5 August 1783-11 February 1862)15
Alexander Hope Grant (8 August 1784-22 August 1793)16
Dundas Charles Grant (21 October 1787-21 March 1788)17
Attributes
Events
Died:1815 February 1805Castle Grant [building], Freuchie [parish], Fife [county], Scotland [country], United Kingdom [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Seafield, p. 485-87, James Grant.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
13 Ibid
14 Ibid
15 Ibid
16 Ibid
17 Ibid
18 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.