Charles Mowat of Busbie and Knockintebir (-after 12 November 1571)

Same as
Additional names
Charles Mowat of Busbie1
Charles Mowat of Knockintebir2
Charles Mowat of Busbie326 February 1534
Parents
Father:4John Mowat of Busbie (-after 18 April 1530)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:5Elizabeth Crawford (-)
Children
Children with Elizabeth Crawford:
James Mowat (-before 12 November 1571)6
William Mowat (-)7
Alexander Mowat (-), burgess of Irvine8
Attributes
Events
Died:9after 12 November 1571
Died:10after 1 December 1576
Died:11before 6 November 1578
He was murdered by William and Henry Stewart, sons of Andrew, Lord Ochiltree.
Personal Info
He had a charter of Moite, Knockintebir, Bogside, Corshouse, Murehouse etc. from James V 30 August 1541 to him and his legitimate heirs male, whom failing to his heirs whatsoever.12
Witness 28 OCtober 1544.13
His grandson James was 12 November 1571 confirmed as apparent heir in Moit, Knokintebir, Bogsyd, Corshous with other properties and rights.14
In 1560 he was ordered to leave the country for taking part in the murder of Sir Neil Montgomery.15
He was a witness for the Earl of Eglinton 18 April 1530 as 'Charles Mowat, apparent of Busbie'.16
He had a sasine of Busby 8 August 1532.17
He gave a tack of the lands of Knokintiber to Robert Huntar of Hunterston and his wife Margaret Crawfurd 24 July 1571. Could Margaret be related to his own wife?18
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 James Balfour Paul and John Maitland Thomson, The Register of the Great Seal of Scotland 1513-1546: Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum (Edinburgh: H. M. General Register House, 1883), No. 512, p. 115.
2 James Balfour Paul and John Maitland Thomson, The Register of the Great Seal of Scotland 1513-1546: Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum (Edinburgh: H. M. General Register House, 1883), No. 3030, p. 710.
3 Robert Pitcairn, Criminal Trials in Scotland vol. 1: (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1833), p. 166-67, Slaughter of the Laird of Craiganis and his servant.
4 David Hay Fleming, The Register of the Privy Seal of Scotland vol. II 1529-1542: Registrum Secreti Sigilli Regum Scotorum (Edinburgh: H. M. General Register House, 1921), No. 1283, p. 170.
5 John Maitland Thomson, The Register of the Great Seal of Scotland 1546-1580: Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum (Edinburgh: H. M. General Register House, 1886), No. 1979, p. 514.
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Robert Pitcairn, Criminal Trials in Scotland vol. 1: (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1833), p. 60-63, Hamesucken - Oppression - Theft, etc..
11 Robert Pitcairn, Criminal Trials in Scotland vol. 1: (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1833), p. 79-80, Slaughter.
12 James Balfour Paul and John Maitland Thomson, The Register of the Great Seal of Scotland 1513-1546: Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum (Edinburgh: H. M. General Register House, 1883), No. 2436, p. 557-58.
13 James Balfour Paul and John Maitland Thomson, The Register of the Great Seal of Scotland 1513-1546: Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum (Edinburgh: H. M. General Register House, 1883), No. 3030, p. 710.
14 John Maitland Thomson, The Register of the Great Seal of Scotland 1546-1580: Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum (Edinburgh: H. M. General Register House, 1886), No. 1979, p. 514.
15 "National Records of Scotland", National Records of Scotland, National Records of Scotland (http://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/ : accessed ), Summary, , GD8/170; .
16 "National Records of Scotland", National Records of Scotland, National Records of Scotland (http://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/ : accessed ), Summary, , GD39/1/44; .
17 George Powell McNeill, The Exchequer Rolls of Scotland vol XVI: Rotuli Scaccarii Regum Scotorum (Edinburgh: H. M. General Register House, 1897), p. 554.
18 M. S. Shaw, Some Family Papers of the Hunters of Hunterston: (Edinburgh: The Scottish Record Society, 1925), p. 30, Annualrent out of Knokintiber.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.