Jane Elphinstone (17 February 1582-after 1628)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Alexander Elphinstone (28 May 1552-14 January 1638), 4. Lord Elphinstone
Mother:2Jane/Jean Livingston (-15 September 1621)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:35 February 1600-01Arthur Forbes (25 April 1581-), 10. Lord Forbes
Children
Children with Arthur Forbes:
Alexander Forbes (-20 April 1672), 11. Lord Forbes4
John Forbes (2 November 1603-young)5
Barbara Forbes (17 January 1607-)6
John Forbes (2 November 1608-), Colonel7
Anna Forbes (1 March 1610-)8
Elizabeth Forbes (8 March 1611-1695)9
William Forbes (2 February 1614-16 May 1654), Governor of Stadt10
Arthur Forbes (29 August 1615-), Captain11
James Forbes (25 May 1617-), Captain12
Attributes
Events
Born:1317 February 1582
Died:14after 1628
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Elphinstone, p. 536-40, IV Alexander Elphinstone.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume IV: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1907), Lord Forbes, p. 60-62, X Arthur Forbes.
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
13 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Elphinstone, p. 536-40, IV Alexander Elphinstone.
14 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.