David Lindsay of Edzell (-December 1646)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Sir David Lindsay of Edzell (-15 October 1610)
Mother:2Helen Lindsay (-December 1579)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3around 1595Margaret Wishart (-)
Marriage contract dated 27 October 1595.
Children
Children with Margaret Wishart:
Alexander Lindsay (-7 January 1638)4
Margaret Lindsay (-)5
Attributes
Events
Died:6December 1646
Personal Info
He had sasine as fiar of Glenesk August 1584, succeeded his father. He was for several years in bad repute at Court in respect of the slaughter of Alexander, Lord Spynie, in June 1607. He had letters of slains from Lord Spynie's children 26 November 1616, and royal remission March 1617. He had a commission of Justiciary in Glenesk 1622.7
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Balcarres, p. 513-14, David Lindsay.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Balcarres, p. 514-15, David Lindsay.
4 Ibid
5 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume VI: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909), Marischal, p. 51-54, V George Keith.
6 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Balcarres, p. 514-15, David Lindsay.
7 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.