John Forbes of Leslie (-)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1William Forbes of Monymusk (-around 1618)
Mother:2Margaret Douglas (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3Jean Leslie (-)
Married:4after 1604Margaret Skene (-)
Children
Children with Margaret Skene:
Alexander Forbes of Auquhorthies (-)5
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
He got the estate of Leslie in 1620 from his brother-in-law, the second Lord of Lindores.6
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Rev. William Temple, The Thanage of Fermartyn: Including the District Commonly Called Formartine, its Proprietors, with Genealogical Deductions; its Parishes, Ministers, Churches, Churchyards, Antiquities, &c (Aberdeen: D. Wyllie & son, 1894), p. 93-105, Rothienorman, Kinbruin, and Badenscoth.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume V: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1908), Lindores, p. 382-84, I Patrick Leslie.
4 William Forbes Skene, Memorials of the Family of Skene of Skene: from the Family Papers with other Illustrative Documents (Aberdeen: The New Spalding Club, 1887), Skene of Skene XII, p. 28-32.
5 Rev. William Temple, The Thanage of Fermartyn: Including the District Commonly Called Formartine, its Proprietors, with Genealogical Deductions; its Parishes, Ministers, Churches, Churchyards, Antiquities, &c (Aberdeen: D. Wyllie & son, 1894), p. 93-105, Rothienorman, Kinbruin, and Badenscoth.
6 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume V: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1908), Lindores, p. 382-84, I Patrick Leslie.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.