Knut Bjørnsen Bjørheim (around 1563-around 1659)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Bjørn Lauritsen Bjørheim (around 1530-before 1596)
Mother:2Sissel Sæbjørnsdatter Talgje (around 1530-around 1614)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3around 1580Udbjørg Tormodsdatter Foss (around 1555-)
Children
Children with Udbjørg Tormodsdatter Foss:
Guri Knutsdatter Bjørheim (around 1580-)4
Sissel Knutsdatter Bjørheim (around 1585-)5
Berta Knutsdatter Bjørheim (around 1590-)6
Eli/Elen Knutsdatter Bjørheim (around 1593-)7
Bjørn Knutsen Bjørheim (around 1595-)8
Åsa Knutsdatter Bjørheim (around 1597-1676)9
Attributes
Events
Born:10around 1563
Died:11around 1659
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Jan Alsvik, Folk i Strand 1: Ei gards- og ættesoge (: Hafrsfjord forlag, 1995), Øvre Bjørheim p. 458-59, Bjørn Lauritsen Bjørheim.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Jan Alsvik, Folk i Strand 1: Ei gards- og ættesoge (: Hafrsfjord forlag, 1995), Øvre Bjørheim p. 459, Knut Bjørnsen Bjørheim.
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Jan Alsvik, Folk i Strand 1: Ei gards- og ættesoge (: Hafrsfjord forlag, 1995), Øvre Bjørheim p. 458-59, Bjørn Lauritsen Bjørheim.
11 Jan Alsvik, Folk i Strand 1: Ei gards- og ættesoge (: Hafrsfjord forlag, 1995), Øvre Bjørheim p. 459, Knut Bjørnsen Bjørheim.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.