Mariota Preston (-)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Sir Henry Preston of Formartin (-around 1433), Laird of Fermartyn
Mother:2Elizabeth Lindsay (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3Alexander Chisholm (-)
Married:4Sir John Forbes (-between 6 August 1453 and July 1454), 1. Laird of Tolquhoun
Children
Children with Sir John Forbes:
Sir John Forbes of Tolquhoun (-), 2. Laird of Tolquhoun5
Duncan Forbes of Argeighton (-)6
David Forbes (Feddan) (-)7
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
She was heiress of the lands of Tolquhoun.8
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume IV: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1907), Lord Forbes, p. 46-47, Sir John de Forbes.
2 Rev. William Temple, The Thanage of Fermartyn: Including the District Commonly Called Formartine, its Proprietors, with Genealogical Deductions; its Parishes, Ministers, Churches, Churchyards, Antiquities, &c (Aberdeen: D. Wyllie & son, 1894), p. 17-24, Fyvie (Meldrum).
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume IV: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1907), Lord Forbes, p. 46-47, Sir John de Forbes.
4 Ibid
5 James Toshach Clark, Genealogical Collections Concerning Families in Scotland, made by Walter MacFarlane 1750-51 vol. II: Edited from the Original Manuscripts in the Advocate's Library (Edinburgh: Scottish History Society, 1900), p. 225-27, The Genealogie of Sir John Forbes with the Black Lipp his 3rd Son who was Sir John Forbes the first of Tolqhone.
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.